Monday, September 9, 2013

Beowulf and Iron Man

Beowulf vs. Iron Man: A Clash of Ancient and Modern Heroes

“Strength does not come from physical capacity.  It comes from an indomitable will.”  Modern and classical heroes are normally classified as “strong” but isn’t there more to this stereotypical classification?  Calling Iron Man strong doesn’t truly mean that he himself is strong but rather his suit is strong.  Calling Beowulf strong is true in the sense that he does have an excessive amount of strength but he also exceedingly mentally strong.  Strength is more than physical capacity but mental capacity as well. These heroes push themselves differently in order to succeed in their journey.  While Beowulf fought and outsmarted monsters and dragons, Ironman created new technology to fight off his foes.  Beowulf and Iron Man both have character traits that reflect their culture’s values.
Heroes face parlous journeys in order to fulfill their quest in life.  Beowulf crosses many bodies of water in order to fight off sea monsters, slay Grendel’s mother, and cross over to Hrothgar’s kingdom.  The bodies of water in his quest are a reoccurring theme in Scandinavian literature since they were crossing them in order to conquer and pillage cities and countries.  They symbolize the battleground in which a brave warrior of that time would fight in, just as Beowulf did.  Tony Stark, however, fought most of his battles in the sky with his suit.  Today, we see air warfare as a normal battleground as we have jets and missiles flying through the sky.  Although they were great heroes, they did have some kind of hype or a buildup of their accomplishments.  Iron Man was extremely wealthy and had the greatest technology available to the world.  He was on top for so long that he did eventually fall because he became complacent with his status.  Tony Stark was this hyperbole of a celebrity.  He was a celebrity in his world much like Beowulf was.  Beowulf fights Grendel “not with the sword” but “unweaponed, for war.” Fighting this powerful monster with your bare hands definatly builds your legacy and Beowulf talked about his accomplishments like a proud warrior would, which impressed many people.  Hrothgar boasts of Beowulf’s determination and his boldness in battle that he says "Never to any man erst I trusted,
since I could heave up hand and shield,
this noble Dane-Hall, till now to thee.
Have now and hold this house unpeered;
remember thy glory; thy might declare;
watch for the foe! No wish shall fail thee
if thou bidest the battle with bold-won life.” 
Sometimes, the foes of the heroes give clues as to a culture’s moral values as well.  Grendel is an offspring of Cain, an allusion to the biblical story of the blackened son of Noah.  Grendel is a pagan-like monster but is a son of Cain, which shows the culture making the transition from a pagan society to Christian society.  Grendel’s mother “gloomy and grim, would go that quest
of sorrow, the death of her son to avenge.”  This shows that loyalty was in turn also a major value the Scandinavians had. In today’s society, we value people who can be loyal rather than people who are traitors just like the Scandinavians did.  For example, Tony Stark’s enemy, Obadiah Stone, betrayed him when he sold weapons to terrorist groups that the U.S. was fighting against which caused Iron Man to take responsibility and fight his once second in command at his company.
Whether heroes are modern or ancient, they both display similar characteristics.  Heroes are brave in battle, wherever it may be whether in the air or sea.  They are loyal to people who are faithful to them and their cause.  Their legends grow as they face more and more obstacles or monsters.  Beowulf may be an ancient Scandinavian hero, but he still possesses the strength of heart, body, and soul, that many of our modern day heroes possess as well, like Iron Man.



7 comments:

  1. You have really cool examples of how Beowulf and Iron Man relate to their different time periods. Your examples of literary devices were a little bit difficult to find, but other than that, nicely done Rachel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the beginning quote; quotes catch my eye instantly. Also, nice use of "high vocabulary" (parlous, eh?) and allusions to historical traits/events. "Strong" can be read as a bit repetitive in the first paragraph and maybe clarify the literary devices? Overall, el ensayo es muy interesante. My Spanish is limited.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First off, nice use of vocabulary. Second, I like how even though many people chose to write about Iron Man, your take was different because you brought a different meaning to "strength" that most people didn't cover.

    The only different thing I would do is clearly state your literary devices somewhere, and say how they were used.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rachel, I liked your comparison between Iron and Beowulf, I believe you made good points about their similarities and differences throughout the essay. Your sentence structures and vocabulary definitely stood out! For the third paragraph, did you use theme as one of the literary techniques?
    Overall, very good essay!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like the way you outlined this essay. It was different from the other Iron Man comparisons. And like what other people posted above your use of vocabulary is great. Overall one of my favorite essays. Good job Rachael! Also I like the quote you put.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rachel, I was very impressed by your essay! Your introduction was particularly strong. I loved the quote you chose to begin your essay with, it really caught my attention! The rhetorical question in the second second also kept my attention! As I was reading your essay I found myself wanting to keep reading instead of having to keep reading. I was interested in seeing what you were going to say next! Also, good use of elevated vocabulary!
    You correctly used literary devices and stated strong examples from Beowulf and Ironman.
    I think this essay really responded to the prompt completely and creatively. The only change I can find to make would be fixing some spaces. In some of your quotes (like the one in the 3rd paragraph, 1st quote) you forgot to put a space between quest and of.
    Your essay was really awesome and and that was the only thing I could find that was kind of wrong! Good job!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rachel, your comparison was very original. My only suggestion would be to shorten the quote at the end of the second paragraph and explain how it is relevant to the point that you're making. Other than that, your essay was very clear, and the literary techniques were well explicated.

    ReplyDelete